投稿指南
一、来稿必须是作者独立取得的原创性学术研究成果,来稿的文字复制比(相似度或重复率)必须低于用稿标准,引用部分文字的要在参考文献中注明;署名和作者单位无误,未曾以任何形式用任何文种在国内外公开发表过;未一稿多投。 二、来稿除文中特别加以标注和致谢之外,不侵犯任何版权或损害第三方的任何其他权利。如果20天后未收到本刊的录用通知,可自行处理(双方另有约定的除外)。 三、来稿经审阅通过,编辑部会将修改意见反馈给您,您应在收到通知7天内提交修改稿。作者享有引用和复制该文的权利及著作权法的其它权利。 四、一般来说,4500字(电脑WORD统计,图表另计)以下的文章,不能说清问题,很难保证学术质量,本刊恕不受理。 五、论文格式及要素:标题、作者、工作单位全称(院系处室)、摘要、关键词、正文、注释、参考文献(遵从国家标准:GB\T7714-2005,点击查看参考文献格式示例)、作者简介(100字内)、联系方式(通信地址、邮编、电话、电子信箱)。 六、处理流程:(1) 通过电子邮件将稿件发到我刊唯一投稿信箱(2)我刊初审周期为2-3个工作日,请在投稿3天后查看您的邮箱,收阅我们的审稿回复或用稿通知;若30天内没有收到我们的回复,稿件可自行处理。(3)按用稿通知上的要求办理相关手续后,稿件将进入出版程序。(4) 杂志出刊后,我们会按照您提供的地址免费奉寄样刊。 七、凡向文教资料杂志社投稿者均被视为接受如下声明:(1)稿件必须是作者本人独立完成的,属原创作品(包括翻译),杜绝抄袭行为,严禁学术腐败现象,严格学术不端检测,如发现系抄袭作品并由此引起的一切责任均由作者本人承担,本刊不承担任何民事连带责任。(2)本刊发表的所有文章,除另有说明外,只代表作者本人的观点,不代表本刊观点。由此引发的任何纠纷和争议本刊不受任何牵连。(3)本刊拥有自主编辑权,但仅限于不违背作者原意的技术性调整。如必须进行重大改动的,编辑部有义务告知作者,或由作者授权编辑修改,或提出意见由作者自己修改。(4)作品在《文教资料》发表后,作者同意其电子版同时发布在文教资料杂志社官方网上。(5)作者同意将其拥有的对其论文的汇编权、翻译权、印刷版和电子版的复制权、网络传播权、发行权等权利在世界范围内无限期转让给《文教资料》杂志社。本刊在与国内外文献数据库或检索系统进行交流合作时,不再征询作者意见,并且不再支付稿酬。 九、特别欢迎用电子文档投稿,或邮寄编辑部,勿邮寄私人,以免延误稿件处理时间。

Polymorphism in rs2229783 of the Alpha 1(XI(5)

来源:西北园艺 【在线投稿】 栏目:期刊导读 时间:2020-08-21 19:59
作者:网站采编
关键词:
摘要:Odds ratios and 95%CIs for KBD were calculated from an unconditional logistic regression model to evaluate relative risk (Table 2). Weakly increased KBD risks were observed among individuals with the

Odds ratios and 95%CIs for KBD were calculated from an unconditional logistic regression model to evaluate relative risk (Table 2). Weakly increased KBD risks were observed among individuals with the homozygote mutant genotype AA at rs (OR= 1.96,P =0.03) and CC at rs (OR= 1.84,P= 0.04), compared with the homozygous wild type GG (rs) and TT (rs). The two SNPs also showed an elevated KBD risk in the recessive model (OR= 2.13, 95%CI= andOR= 1.81, 95%CI= ), but the significance did not remain after Bonferroni correction. However, rs was associated with a decreased risk of KBD in the dominant model (OR= 0.49, 95%CI= ,P= 0.0001), which remained significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. These results suggest that polymorphism inCOL11A1 is associated with susceptibility to KBD: carriers of the mutant allele ‘A’ in rs have a decreased risk for KBD relative to those homozygous for the wild type allele ‘G’.

To explore whether rs contributes to the severity of KBD, the effect of rs on the clinical stage of KBD was further observed in the KBD group. When the allele and genotype frequencies were compared according to clinical stage of KBD, no significant association was detected. Dominant and recessive models were also applied to rectify this, and the results showed a lack of association between polymorphisms of rs and the severity of KBD (Table 3).

KBD is an endemic OA with a specific geographical distribution. In the present study, we first investigated the associations between 22 SNPs in theCOL11A1 gene and the corresponding risk of KBD in a Han Chinese population. A coding region single nucleotide polymorphism (cSNPs) rs (Ile1602Ile) showed a significant association with the risk of KBD. The results suggested that polymorphisms in theCOL11A1 gene play an important role in the risk of KBD in the Han Chinese population. Subjects who carry allele ‘A’ in rs have a lower risk of KBD than those who do not. The polymorphic locus rs, which is located in exon 62 ofCOL11A1, has been reported to be a susceptibility locus for LDH[4]. However, there are limited studies on the function of rs in osteoarthropathy. The effects of rs on clinical characteristics of KBD (clinical stages of KBD) were further observed in the KBD group in our study; dominant and recessive models were also applied to rectify it. However, our data showed a lack of association betweenCOL11A1 gene polymorphism and severity of KBD in the northwest Han Chinese population. These results suggest a role ofCOL11A1 in the susceptibility to but not in the severity of KBD. Polymorphisms of theCOL11A1 gene may play an important role in determining the expression ofCOL11A and should be correlated with cartilage destruction via changes in the expression ofCOL11A related to KBD. In the present study, the expression ofCOL11A in articular cartilage of the knee was further analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Our results showed that the percentages of cells that stained positive forCOL11A was lower in the KBD group than in the is a quantitatively minor component of cartilage collagen fibrils, but it is essential for the interaction between proteoglycan (PG) aggregates and collagens, and the highly oriented network of the fibrillar collagens offers tensile strength[10]. However, the expression ofCOL11A was lower in knee articular cartilage of KBD, and the reduction inCOL11A, the critical organizer of ECM, ultimately causes disintegration of the ECM and joint degeneration related to KBD. Therefore, we believe that the A allele of rs may induce a relative increase inCOL11A expression compared with the G allele, and this increase may be associated with a reduced risk of KBD; further studies should be carried out to explore it.

Table of Genotype and Allele Frequencies between Cases and ControlsSNPsGenotype (%)*Minor Allele Frequency (%) KBD (N = 274)Controls (N = 248)P ValuesKBDControlsP Values rs.0/14.6/0.482.3/16.9/ rs.5/13.2/0.483.5/15.7/ rs.8/30.3/2.970.2/26.2/ rs.3/35.0/3.667.5/28.1/ rs47.8/37.9/14.347.4/45.3/ rs.0/42.1/5.953.2/37.4/ rs.9/35.8/3.368.4/28.7/ rs70.4/27.7/1.853.9/41.3/ rs.9/15.7/0.481.8/17.4/ rs.5/45.6/9.945.3/46.4/ rs.6/15.1/0.481.4/17.8/ rs.2/35.2/3.767.1/28.1/ rs.8/15.8/0.481.4/17.8/ rs.5/23.4/2.269.2/29.6/ rs.6/15.1/0.482.1/17.1/ rs.2/35.2/3.767.3/27.8/ rs.8/16.4/0.783.9/16.1/ rs.0/11.7/0.486.7/13.3/ rs.0/11.7/0.483.8/16.2/ rs.2/12.4/0.483.8/16.2/ rs47.8/37.1/15.148.6/42.5/ rs.9/15.7/0.481.8/17.4/

Table 2. Analysis of Association of the 22 SNPs Gene Polymorphism with the Risk of KBDSNPsGenotype Model*Dominant ModelRecessive ModelAllele Model** AAABBB OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OROR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI) rs.45 ()0.75 ()1.000.82 ()0.45 ()0.74 () rs.46 ()0.81 ()1.000.80 ()0.47 ()0.79 () rs.92 ()1.24 ()1.001.16 ()0.79 ()1.13 () rs.95 ()1.40 ()1.001.30 ()0.81 ()1.21 () rs1.96 ()a0.76 ()1.000.98 ()2.13 ()a1.17 () rs.74 ()1.07 ()1.001.05 ()0.60 ()0.95 () rs.22 ()1.40 ()1.001.39 ()1.17 ()1.28 () rs0.48 ()0.71 ()1.000.49 ()b0.35 ()0.73 () rs.44 ( )0.88 ( )1.000.86 ()0.45 ()0.85 () rs.04 ( )0.99 ( )1.001.03 ()1.24 ()1.00 () rs.45 ()0.74 ()1.000.80 ()0.47 (0.04/5.80)0.74 () rs.93 ()1.41 ()1.001.29 ()0.74 ()1.21 () rs.45 ()0.77 ()1.000.85 ()0.47 ()0.76 () rs.47 ()0.69 ()1.000.78 ()1.85 ()0.79 () rs.45 ()0.76 ()1.000.84 ()0.45 ()0.76 () rs.89 ()1.44 ()1.001.31 ()0.74 ()1.21 () rs/ 0.99 ()1.001.08 ()/1.07 () rs/0.81 ()1.000.89 ()/0.87 () rs/0.62 ()1.000.71 ()/0.69 () rs/0.66 ()1.000.76 ()/0.72 () rs1.84 ()a0.79 ()1.001.03 ()1.81 ()a1.16 () rs.44 ()0.88 (01.000.85 ()0.41 ()0.85 ()

文章来源:《西北园艺》 网址: http://www.xbyyzz.cn/qikandaodu/2020/0821/434.html



上一篇:西北某地内镜下诊治小儿结直肠息肉的临床研究
下一篇:贾植芳与西北

西北园艺投稿 | 西北园艺编辑部| 西北园艺版面费 | 西北园艺论文发表 | 西北园艺最新目录
Copyright © 2018 《西北园艺》杂志社 版权所有
投稿电话: 投稿邮箱: